The Spiraling Homestead

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

Save the Earth - Die Yourself Green

It's a subject few people want to discuss. Oh well. Sometimes you need to. Dying green. I mean - you - when you die. Have a green funeral. Oh!!!! Really?! Ewww!
Here's an article that ran in our paper:

Taking green living to the grave
Interest grows in natural burials; Tompkins County home to a natural cemetery

When people stop by the booth Nathan Butler sets up to promote his funeral home, people routinely tell him they aren't interested in the trappings of a modern burial.

"They say 'Put me in a sheet and put me in a ditch,' " Butler says.

For many potential customers -- and in the funeral business that's everyone -- Butler sees a growing recognition that modern burials are wasteful, needlessly expensive and a capstone to one's life that is anything but earth-friendly.

So, Butler's funeral home is positioning itself on the forefront of the next wave in death care: the green burial.

Though burials come in many shades, the greenest involve cemeteries that look less like golf courses and more like nature preserves, caskets made of cardboard and bodies that aren't juiced up with embalming fluids, all at a fraction of the cost of a traditional burial.

Not confined to the tree huggers of the Pacific Northwest, green cemeteries have opened in places such as the Tompkins County community of Newfield, home to the 100-acre Greensprings Natural Cemetery, bordered by two forests. Also, there are green cemeteries in the South Carolina foothills and northeastern Ohio, and two are on the horizon in Indiana.

Final wasteland
In a society that is becoming more environmentally conscious about its coffee and its cars, leaders of the green burial movement say it only makes sense that attention would also turn to the final choices of one's life.

To the most zealous, the modern cemetery is something akin to an ecological wasteland: acres of grass manicured with fertilizers and pesticides, caskets fashioned from steel, copper, bronze or old-growth hardwoods and thick concrete vaults (the boxes in which the caskets are placed).

The corpse is most often embalmed in formaldehyde, which will eventually leach into the soil once the tomb is breached.

"If you look at your typical modern cemetery, it functions less as a natural, bucolic resting ground for the dead than as a landfill of largely nonbiodegradable, and in some cases toxic, material," says Mark Harris, whose book (Scribner, 2007, $24) "Grave Matters: A Journey Through the Modern Funeral Industry to a Natural Way of Burial" the manifesto of the movement.

The Green Burial Council, a nonprofit that sets standards for natural burials, says enough casket metal is put into American soil every year to build a new Golden Gate bridge.

"Do we need to expend that kind of energy on a box we are going to use for one or two days and then bury forever?" asks Joe Sehee, executive director of the Green Burial Council. "Does that really jibe with our values? An increasing number of Americans are saying, 'No, it doesn't.' "

The green burial movement is still small -- just 12 certified green cemeteries across the country and about 60 green-certified funeral homes. But the approaching deaths of baby boomers, the generation behind Earth Day, are pushing funeral industry leaders to anticipate a surge in requests for greener farewells.

Educating consumers, providers
Part of the challenge to the growth of green burial lies in education, experts say.

Green funeral providers say refrigeration and a few natural tricks of the trade are enough to make unembalmed bodies presentable for open-casket calling and funerals.

Ecology aside, the green burial movement could turn the funeral business upside down in other ways.

Economically, modern burials that include embalming, steel caskets and concrete vaults can cost $10,000 or more. Green burials can be done for less than $2,000. The cost of burial plots can vary widely, but Butler expects that his natural burial spaces should be at or below costs for regular plots.

Karen Conyers, of Bloomington, Ind., buried her mother using a simple casket and no embalming, primarily for environmental reasons. But it also made economic sense.

"I don't think the family is well-served by spending thousands of dollars for something that isn't that big a part of life," says Conyers.

Ecumenical appeal
Harris found in researching his book that interest in a greener burial has appeal across religious lines.

For Muslims and Jews, whose burial practices demand that the body be allowed to decompose naturally, the fundamental notion of returning to the earth has never gone out of style. But for more than a century, most Christian funerals in America have been built less on the notion of "ashes to ashes, dust to dust" than on making caskets and vaults as impenetrable to the elements as possible.

Green burials -- by inviting decay and returning the body's elements to the earth as naturally as possible -- promise to change all that. In green cemeteries, the decay of burial remains helps feed the plants and the trees.

More Information
Article On Low Cost Burials in Michigan

The Green Burial Council

Grave Matters Website

Bringing Funerals Home - Article

How To Be Green In The Afterlife

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

UN News May 20

FOOD CRISIS, CLIMATE CHANGE AND INFLUENZA ARE MAIN THREATS TO HEALTH, SAYS UN
New York, May 19 2008 6:00PM
The global food crisis, climate change and pandemic influenza are the main threats to human health, according to the United Nations World Health Organization.

“These three critical events, these clear threats to international security, have the potential to undo much hard-won progress in public health,” WHO Director-General Margaret Chan said today in Geneva.

Speaking at the opening of the 61st session of the World Health Assembly, which is WHO’s supreme decision-making body, Ms. Chan said the organization had identified 21 “hot spots” around the world which are already experiencing high levels of acute and chronic malnutrition. As part of the international task force on the global crisis caused by soaring food prices, WHO is aiming to guide priority action, she said.

Ms. Chan added that an estimated 3.5 million deaths a year are caused by undernutrition, and that poor households spend on average between 50 and 75 per cent of their income on food. “More money spent on food means less money available for health care, especially for the many millions of poor households who rely on out-of-pocket payments when they fall ill.”

On climate change, she said that more droughts, floods and tropical storms would add to the demands for humanitarian assistance and would result in a growing number of environmental refugees. “Again, the poor will be the first and hardest hit. Climate change is already adding an additional set of stresses in areas that are already fragile, with marginal livelihoods and thin margins of survival when shocks occur.”

Ms. Chan described pandemic influenza, potentially set off by the spread of bird flu to humans, as the “third global crisis looming on the horizon.” She said that “the threat has by no means receded, and we would be very unwise to let down our guard, or slacken our preparedness measures.”

“As with climate change, all countries will be affected, though in a far more rapid and sweeping way,” she added.

The week-long session of the World Health Assembly will also discuss female genital mutilation (FGM) and the harmful use of alcohol.
2008-05-19 00:00:00.000

BIODIVERSITY KEY TO TACKING GLOBAL FOOD CRISIS – UN AGENCY
New York, May 19 2008 12:00PM
Just 12 crops and 14 animal species provide most of the world’s food, and this lack of diversity means that the food supply has become more vulnerable and less sustainable – according to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization.

“The erosion of biodiversity for food and agriculture severely compromises global food security,” FAO Assistant Director-General Alexander Müller said today. “We need to strengthen our efforts to protect and wisely manage biodiversity for food security,” he added.

Speaking at the beginning of a global conference on the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) in Bonn, Germany, Mr. Müller called on the international community to intensify its commitment to integrating food security and biodiversity concerns.

FAO also raised the alarm about a worldwide decline in biodiversity. It estimates that the genetic diversity of agricultural crops has declined by 75 per cent over the last century and that hundreds of the 7,000 animal breeds registered in FAO databases are threatened with extinction.

FAO says that less genetic diversity means that there are fewer opportunities for the growth and innovation needed to boost agriculture at a time of soaring food prices.

Related: 26700
2008-05-19 00:00:00.000

Labels: , , ,

Saturday, May 17, 2008

UN News May 17

PARTICIPANTS AT UN-BACKED MEETING AGREE TO WORK TOWARDS RULES ON BIOSAFETY
New York, May 17 2008 6:00PM
More than 2,000 participants attending a week-long biosafety meeting that wrapped up yesterday have agreed to work towards legally binding rules for liability and redress for potential damage caused by the movements of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) reports.

The participants at the fourth meeting of the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, held in Bonn, Germany, and said to be the largest ever gathering on the issue, have reached a deal on both a timetable and a framework for negotiating the rules and procedures.

The contents of the legally binding instrument for liability and redress for the GMOs, also known as living modified organisms (LMOs), will now be discussed at the next meeting of the parties to the Protocol, itself a supplementary agreement to the Convention on Biological Diversity. That meeting is scheduled to take place in October 2010 in Nagoya, Japan.

Ahmed Djoghlaf, Executive Secretary to the Convention, welcomed the agreement, calling it "great news for the biodiversity family."

While GMOs or LMOs have the potential to increase agricultural yields and to grow in habitats otherwise unfavourable to crops, there are also widespread concerns that they might pose major threats to local ecosystems and therefore biodiversity.

Labels: , ,