The Spiraling Homestead

Thursday, April 22, 2010

Great Plains Running Out of Water

I have been sounding the alarm about this since I lived in TX - over a decade ago. People there use water like there's no tomorrow to have the grass, flowers and trees they grew up with in the Northern states. I was disgusted by their lack of respect for an exhaustable supply of water, particularly given the state's history during the dust bowl years.

They need to change the way they irrigate, WHAT they irrigate and how often. This is a massive task that must be successfully accomplished if we, as a nation, are going to continue feeding ourselves.

Excerpts:

People have been warning about the aquifer's depletion for years, but coordinating conservation programs among farmers has proved difficult. Recently, Texas has imposed state controls on the amount of groundwater that farmers can pump, requiring 16 groundwater districts to each provide a target for an acceptable groundwater level in 50 years.

"The magnitude of this is incredible," he continued. "We're talking about, for the last 20 years, 20 percent of the irrigated acreage of this nation is over the Ogallala."

For an idea of what a severe drought could do to the communities of the Great Plains, consider the Dust Bowl of the 1930s, when gigantic "black blizzards" ravaged farms and forced thousands of families to give up their land and try to make a living elsewhere.

Labels: , ,

Monday, August 3, 2009

Rain Water Never Felt So Good


Here in the North East US, we hardly need any more rain. Entire crops are ruined due to how much rain we get and the frequency with which we are getting it. Or, are we just spoiled from many years off average?

To look at my great great grandmother's diaries (yes, we have them! 1894-1924), the frequency of rain was twice what we have been averaging for at least the last decade. And the creek across the road from my house proves it.

Growing up, that creek never ran dry. Ever. It always ran fast and quite often, mid-shin depth. There used to be a ferry across the Susquehanna just down the road - Harper's Ferry. Now, the creek is barely above the top of a person's foot, even with 4" of rain in July and 3/4" of rain the first 2 days of August. The ferry? Long gone. Even if we didn't have bridges every few miles, the water is so low no ferry could think about crossing. Most places, the water is no more than knee deep.

That tells me 2 things - we aren't getting enough rain, and we've overdeveloped our land. For another article that goes more in depth about this, click here. I have theories on droughts and drought monitoring that you might wish to explore - and even discuss!
I'm all ears and would love to hear view points after you read this...

So yes, we've had a rainy slightly below average temperature summer thus far. It's sad that our crops are drowning, rotting, molding in the fields. There are many factors that created the issue. But it doesn't successfully create an argument about not collecting rain water and not trying to keep it on the land, rather than usher it away as quickly as possible. Look at the ways I've discussed in collecting rain water or using the water from your roof and driveway without actually collecting it. It makes life far easier, greener and healthier for all.

Labels: , , , , ,

Saturday, March 28, 2009

Water Is NOT Infinite

Our bodies (human, that is) are at least 60% water. I say at least because I learned it to be 80%, but the numbers vary. I think that's because they are talking about what isn't directly in cells, rather than cell and free floating.

Anyway, we aren't just carbon-based units - we are far more water-based. So, with something that is so vital to us, we tend to be very casual, and abusive of it. Why is that? When you look at a country such as Australia, which is in a drought of unprecedented proportions. I have friends there, and have only heard about the drought. I've never heard anything else but drought conditions, and it's going on its 8th year.

I just found the following quote from a newspaper article from The Australian online newspaper: But Dr Cai and Dr Cowan are convinced that the DOI is a “bigger scale” phenomenon which can overpower ENSO. As well, they will report in GRL that climate change is an even broader scale phenomenon that is increasing the frequency of IOD events.

The above quote truly points out the theory posed in the movie "The Day After Tomorrow". While it may not happen nearly as quickly as the movie shows it, it's a very solid theory that is being borne out in a different way, south of the Equator.

How we use our water in the US is not going to make a difference in what happens in Australia. However, if we learn from them, we are far less likely to be so severely affected as they. What is scary is, we aren't learning. The following picture is a map of the Great Plains (Ogallala Aquifer) and it's water decline (without replenishment) over the last 50 years:
You know what that major area is called? America's Breadbasket. And what else? Desert.

They are now saying that the 30 million people who rely on the Colorado River in 7 different states will be without water by 2021. All from overuse, and increasing temperatures evaporating it as well as reducing the snowpack that fills it in the springtime.

So - what can we do? It's easy - reduce!
Look at an article I wrote on how much water is used just to produce our energy.
Reduce the amount of energy you use.
Reduce the amount of WATER you use.
Reduce the amount of water you BUY - really, how stupid is that?
Learn good gardening techniques that will significantly reduce watering you might need to do during the hottest months of the summer.
Use rain barrels. Divert the water from your rooftops and driveways into your lawns and flower beds.
Use the water from your washer to water your container plants.

Check for leaks in your water system. Make sure all faucets are turned off in your house. If your meter changes position during this time, you have at least one leak. Find it by ruling out all lines - shut off all but one and check the meter again - keep doing until you find the leak. Fix the leaks!

Don't flush your toilet as often. If you have an old toilet that uses up to 8 gallons per flush, start looking at replacing it. The first generation of low flow toilets were horrid, but they've improved greatly (we have a Toto that is phenomenal).

Change the way you shower. WWII Navy personnel learned to take the 2 minute shower. Challenge yourself to take a shorter shower. You can reduce your time, reduce the flow which reduces the volume you use, or shut the flow off while you're soaping up. My dad uses the first, I use the second and my mom uses the third. All work the same.

Don't wash your car. It's actually better to leave the grunge on in the NE during the winter time, as warm wet salt. Cold wet salt does less, and cold dry salt doesn't do anything. Leave it. You're also less likely to have it stolen. If you must wash your car, do it at a public car wash. You use about half the water, and it's generally filtered and recycled now.

Don't water your lawn. If you live in a dry area, cut down on the amount of lawn you have. Pay attention to your irrigation system. Don't water the road or the sidewalk. I lived in Dallas TX for about a year, and was able to reduce the water use at the house by half, just by changing the way the system watered the lawn. Rather than 1 30-minute cycle for each zone, I watered it in 4 5-minute cycles. It didn't run off, but had a chance to soak in. This meant it stayed moister for a far longer time, reducing the number of times the lawn was watered, and used less water overall.
If you don't live in a dry area, don't water. It isn't necessary. And often, it isn't watered properly, making the grass even weaker during the hottest period.

Don't use container plants. I hate container plants. They have no way to hold their moisture. They just evaporate and transevaporate (through the leaves) so quickly that you're watering gallons for singular plants. That's just wrong.

Divert Rain Water - it's virtually impossible to use a rain barrel that will collect enough water, but if you want to, go for it. It only takes a few minutes of a good thunderstorm to fill a 55 gallon drum. What happens to the rest of the storm's water? And what if there are several in a few days' time? Look at the flow of the water and sculpt your lawn to either collect it in an area that is perpetually dry, or to disperse it much like irrigation ditches in developing countries. It works wonders! I'll be posting one project here that I started last year and will be making look good this year.
Only wash full loads. When you use your washer, particularly if you have a teenager, you tend to not wash full loads. Stop that right now! It's costing YOU, not just the environment. In energy, water and detergent.

Use your dishwasher. If you use your dishwasher, vs hand washing your dishes, you can save half of the total volume. Washers are even smarter now, using only what is necessary for your style of washing - the first few times it washes, it may use more, but it's "learning" you and your dishes dirt level. This saves ever more.

None of these ideas are ground breaking or life-changing. But they all work. Be efficient!

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, March 5, 2009

Artificial Wetlands for Wastewater Management

Since it's coming up on Ground Water Awareness Week - who knew an official week existed for Ground Water?! - I'm posting a paper I wrote for my assemblywoman and a few town officials in the area.

The primary reason for using Artificial Wetlands for our wastewater management is outlined both in the paper, and in understanding the basic "ground water hydrology". I learn more good words because of this blog!

So - read the above, and then read the paper. I've written another that I am sending to Mother Earth News with the hopes of it being printed. We'll see. Until then, I can't post it here as it would violate their publishing policies. Wah.

NYS's fact sheet on ground water

Introduction

In the 1700’s, NYS had approximately 2.6 million acres of natural wetlands. By the 1980’s, 60% of these wetlands had been destroyed by agriculture, industry, housing development and water overuse. Since Federal Regulatory rollbacks during the 1990’s, NYS has an infamous position as one of the top 15 states for wetland destruction. (Riverkeeper.org)

What we are failing to understand, but other states and nations are seizing upon is that wetlands provide a vital service of purifying our water for future use.

Example

Egypt, as a developing nation, faces an increasing need for water purification without the funding or resources to treat their human black water. From 2000 to 2004, they focused on a low-tech solution to this low-tech issue of sewage treatment – the construction of a 60-acre artificial wetland adjacent to natural wetlands at ¼ the cost of conventional sewage treatment for a comparable volume of sewage. The initial volume of sewage treated was 25,000 metric tons (1 mt = 2205 pounds) per day. However, after a year of use, it was determined the wetland was capable of treating 40,000 metric tons per day. This increase in treatment volume increases the value of the initial investment of $9 million (US) even more than the initial estimated savings over conventional treatment facilities.

For Egypt, maintenance costs are nothing, with local livestock handlers cutting the reeds for feed at no cost to them. It has also improved the local fisheries by lowering the contamination of the waterways with nitrates and heavy metals, improving the health and size of the fish. This, in turn, has improved the local fishing industry. The combination of factors has substantially improved the local economy, the health of the local population and the environment surrounding them. It has thus piqued the interest of other locales within Egypt to assist in solving poverty, health issues and environmental imbalance with a very low overall cost. (WaterWiki.net)

History

The idea and development of artificial wetlands to treat human wastewater began in Germany during the 1970’s. The research included the optimal size of each wetland “cell”, ideal plant life to act as biofilters to remove solids, nitrates, and heavy metals, and ideal delivery methods of the black water. And while the very convincing data was collected quickly and with great success, the promotion of the technology failed miserably.

In roughly 30 years, only 600 US communities have seized upon the opportunity to reduce their costs and environmental impact, compared to Taiwan, which filters 230,000 metric tons per day (19% of their population’s waste) with 43 artificial wetlands and at a cost of only $17.7 million (US). (Taipei Times)

Technology

Artificial wetlands can be adapted to any environment, from sub-arctic to a desert climate due to the microorganisms living among the reed and grass roots, filtering 90% of the contaminants. The reeds and grasses, absorbing the nitrates and heavy metals the microorganisms make available through the breakdown of the solids, manage the final 10%. Native species to each region are used as often as possible, allowing native wildlife to flourish as well, with virtually no risk to the wildlife.

Depending on the region that adopts the artificial wetlands for black water purification, native soils may be used to form the cells, furthering the environmental improvements. Also, 2 forms of black water delivery have been developed to allow easier adaptation to climate, land availability and purpose. A subsurface delivery of the black water occurs through a gravel substrate into the root zone of the reeds and grasses, allowing less land to be used and a lower risk of mosquito infestation. A surface delivery requires more land, but allows for a larger variety of soils used as the walls and floor of the cells, can absorb storm run off more efficiently and is superior to sustaining native wildlife, which in turn controls mosquito infestations.

A hybridization of the artificial wetland is being met with equal success, by incorporating septic tanks, grinder pumps and aerators into the delivery system of the black water.

Studies

Studies at several universities within the US and Canada are proving the successes sited at a diverse range of communities, from CO to AZ to NY and NH. The communities within these states (and others) have known for more than a decade the artificial wetland is comparable (if not superior) to conventional sewage treatment with the added benefit of substantially lower costs, less odor management issues, wildlife recovery and improved property values. Appropriately designed and observed, these designed ecospheres allow for less contaminated effluent to escape during storms, increase wildlife habitat and increase in quality of life for their communities.

Research done at the University of Nevada has determined their climate’s ideal cell size is 30’ x 130’ x 38”, which can handle 7500 gallons per day with a construction cost of approximately $185,000, including twice yearly checks and pump maintenance.

Some studies have stated cells fill more quickly with residual solids, making the cells’ life cycle shorter than the 20-30 year projection given by professionals. This can be remedied in a way similar to Milwaukee’s solution to their bio-solids removal for over 80 years. In the early 1900’s, after adopting the newly designed process of the activated sludge process, there was still a volume of bio-solids that needed to be disposed of. After analyzing the solids, it was determined the solids could be utilized as an organic fertilizer marketed to commercial growers, landscapers and golf courses with a superior growing result to artificial (and more expensive) fertilizers marketed with great success following WWII. Milorganite has since been marketed at the consumer level as well as the commercial growers, with continued success. (Milorganite.com)

By draining a cell, moving the established flora to a new cell and then dredging the full cell will allow for the use of the accumulated matter by the community, renewing the cell for use once again.

Adaptation

The most recent adaptation of the artificial wetlands is in the CAFO (Confined Animal Feeding Operation) Industry. CAFOs have discovered the lagoons created by the bovine and swine they raise can be effectively managed with the artificial wetlands. The wetlands virtually eliminate smell, the need for pesticides to manage insect infestation of the waste lagoons, and the health hazard the lagoon once posed at identical cost. Along with these obvious bonuses to the investment, the location of the CAFO greatly improved by the sight of wetland grasses and reeds versus the previous lagoon of waste.

What If

The August, 2005 lagoon breach in Lowville, NY could have been prevented if it had incorporated this solution, avoiding the death of nearly 250,000 fish over a roughly 40 mile run to Lake Ontario, where the effluent ultimately settled. (DawnWatch.com)

The flood of 2006 suffered by multiple counties in upstate NY and PA would have caused far less damage to the Chesapeake Bay, had the communities affected used artificial wetlands to treat their sewage and wastewater.

Links
University of NV contact information:
Angela O’Callaghan
AREA SPECIALIST
UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA

The paper presents an introduction to EcoSan principles and concepts including re-use aspects (available nutrients and occurring risks), and case studies of EcoSan concepts in both industrialized and developing countries.
EcoWaters

Institute of Sanitary Engineering and Water Pollution Control, BOKU—University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna, Muthgasse 18, A-1190 Vienna, Austria

Links to companies and researchers working on artificial wetlands for blackwater treatment
Constructed Wetlands

Ohio State Research Paper

Labels: , , , ,

Ground Water Awareness Week March 8-14

Well Owners www.wellowner.org. information site
An estimated 88 to 100 million persons in the United States are served by community drinking water systems that rely on ground water as their sole or primary source (1,2); approximately 15 million U.S. households have their own private wells (3). Each year, the National Ground Water Association sponsors Ground Water Awareness Week to stress the importance of protecting ground water and to focus attention on annual private well maintenance and water testing (4). This year, Ground Water Awareness Week is March 8--14.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regulations that protect public drinking water systems do not apply to privately owned wells (5). Owners of private wells are responsible for ensuring that their well water is safe from contaminants of health concern. Possible contaminants include disease-causing microorganisms, natural contaminants, and manufactured pollutants. Twenty waterborne-disease outbreaks associated with drinking water were reported to CDC during 2005--2006, including seven outbreaks caused by bacteria and viruses in ground water sources (6).

Private wells should be located away from potential contamination sources such as septic and waste-water systems, animal enclosures, and chemical storage areas (5). Private wells also should be checked every year for mechanical problems, cleanliness, and the presence of coliform bacteria and any other contaminants of local concern. A local health department or water well systems professional can help ensure delivery of high-quality water from an existing well or, if needed, help locate and construct a new well in a safer area. Additional information about well maintenance and water testing is available at Testing .

References

1. US Environmental Protection Agency. Factoids: drinking water and ground water statistics for 2008. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency; 2009. Available at EPA Factoids .

2. US Environmental Protection Agency. Economic analysis for the final ground water rule. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency; 2006. Available at EPA Safewater .

3. US Census Bureau. American housing survey for the United States: 2007. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau; 2008. Available at Census .

4. National Ground Water Association. National ground water awareness week. Westerville, OH: National Ground Water Association; 2009. Available at Awareness Week .

5. US Environmental Protection Agency. Private drinking water wells. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency; 2006. Available at EPA Private Wells .

6. CDC Surveillance for waterborne disease and outbreaks

Labels: , , , ,

Friday, January 23, 2009

50-Year Farming Plan

Sent to me by Jerome Rigot

A 50-Year Farm Bill
By WES JACKSON and WENDELL BERRY
Published: January 4, 2009

THE extraordinary rainstorms last June caused catastrophic soil erosion in the grain lands of Iowa, where there were gullies 200 feet wide. But even worse damage is done over the long term under normal rainfall — by tthe little rills and sheets of erosion on incompletely covered or denuded cropland, and by various degradations resulting from industrial procedures and technologies alien to both agriculture and nature.

Soil that is used and abused in this way is as nonrenewable as (and far more valuable than) oil. Unlike oil, it has no technological substitute — annd no powerful friends in the halls of government.

Agriculture has too often involved an insupportable abuse and waste of soil, ever since the first farmers took away the soil-saving cover and roots of perennial plants. Civilizations have destroyed themselves by destroying their farmland. This irremediable loss, never enough noticed, has been made worse by the huge monocultures and continuous soil-exposure of the agriculture we now practice.

To the problem of soil loss, the industrialization of agriculture has added pollution by toxic chemicals, now universally present in our farmlands and streams. Some of this toxicity is associated with the widely acclaimed method of minimum tillage. We should not poison our soils to save them.

Industrial agricultural has made our food supply entirely dependent on fossil fuels and, by substituting technological "solutions" for human work and care, has virtually destroyed the cultures of husbandry (imperfect as they may have been) once indigenous to family farms and farming neighborhoods.

Clearly, our present ways of agriculture are not sustainable, and so our food supply is not sustainable. We must restore ecological health to our agricultural landscapes, as well as economic and cultural stability to our rural communities.

For 50 or 60 years, we have let ourselves believe that as long as we have money we will have food. That is a mistake. If we continue our offenses against the land and the labor by which we are fed, the food supply will decline, and we will have a problem far more complex than the failure of our paper economy. The government will bring forth no food by providing hundreds of billons of dollars to the agribusiness corporations.

Any restorations will require, above all else, a substantial increase in the acreages of perennial plants. The most immediately practicable way of doing this is to go back to crop rotations that include hay, pasture and grazing animals.

But a more radical response is necessary if we are to keep eating and preserve our land at the same time. In fact, research in Canada, Australia, China and the United States over the last 30 years suggests that perennialization of the major grain crops like wheat, rice, sorghum and sunflowers can be developed in the foreseeable future. By increasing the use of mixtures of grain-bearing perennials, we can better protect the soil and substantially reduce greenhouse gases, fossil-fuel use and toxic pollution.

Carbon sequestration would increase, and the husbandry of water and soil nutrients would become much more efficient. And with an increase in the use of perennial plants and grazing animals would come more employment opportunities in agriculture — provided, of course,, that farmers would be paid justly for their work and their goods.

Thoughtful farmers and consumers everywhere are already making many necessary changes in the production and marketing of food. But we also need a national agricultural policy that is based upon ecological principles. We need a 50-year farm bill that addresses forthrightly the problems of soil loss and degradation, toxic pollution, fossil-fuel dependency and the destruction of rural communities.

This is a political issue, certainly, but it far transcends the farm politics we are used to. It is an issue as close to every one of us as our own stomachs.

Wes Jackson is a plant geneticist and president of The Land Institute in Salina, Kan. Wendell Berry is a farmer and writer in Port Royal, Ky.

Labels: , , , , ,

Monday, January 19, 2009

Watering Light Bulbs

Water Used For Making Electricity

It takes me forever to read things of interest to me - the vertigo thing gets in the way. So, I just read this article from the August 2008 inssue of Mother Earth News titled The Intertwined Tale of Energy and Water

The authors are from Virginia Tech, and have crunched the numbers for how much water is needed in creating our electricty. They've even broken it down as to how much each energy source uses water with both high and low values. I've taken a median approach to come up with my numbers.

Making A Lightbulb

So then, I went on a search for how much energy it takes to actually produce a light bulb. Then I looked for both incandescent bulbs and CFLs. I haven't looked for LED's and doubt highly I'll find the numbers I'm looking for. It was difficult enough to find them for the first 2 light bulbs.
This gent took his numbers from a Dutch study , and I've taken many of my numbers from him - along with making a few more assumptions - LOL - scary, but in reality, it doesn't add up to much.

Where am I going with the and the title? Here it is: We don't think about the amount of water it takes to produce all of the little things in our lives. Nor do we think about the amount of water it takes to keep them running. Well, these two articles focus on the light bulb. The lowly light bulb.

Water For Energy

It takes 1600 gallons of water to produce 100 kWh of energy. Roughly. It depends on the energy source. However, for NYS, we'll go with 1600 since we have such a mix of energy sources. You can do your own figures.

A Light Bulb's Life Cycle

The Dutch study went through the entire life cycle of regular and CFL's - from production to disposal. The CFL takes far more energy - and thus water - to produce, but in the end, even if you only get half the life-expectancy the manufacturers claim it has, it takes only 1/4 of the energy.

The CFL - uses about 1974 gallons of water over its life (1000 hours).
The incandescent - uses about 960 gallons of water over it's life (125 hours)
At first blush, it looks like a no-brainer. Why are we switching to CFL's? Because you'll go through about 8 regular bulbs in that same socket that you could have the CFL. Even if you only went through 4, you're still using far more energy and WATER to create/use/dispose of that regular bulb, compared to the CFL.

It Adds Up

And why is this so important? Well, take a look at the number of light sockets you have in your house. Someone came up with an average of 30 per house. I think that's under estimated. I just did a mental list of our house - which is smallll - and came up with 42. If you have even that average of 30 (if all the bulbs blew at once, how many would it take for you to replace them all?), and if you only replaced 1/3 of them with CFL compared to standard bulbs, You'll be saving a huge chunk of water.

Granted, not every socket can take a CFL and not every light should have one. Short duration lighting is better left to incandescents - they last longer and actually use less energy when turned on for 4 minutes or less - compared to the CFL. But there are many throughout the house that can very effectively be changed to CFL's. 5 of the fixtures are already flourescent or CFL. 13 have been converted to CFL and the rest are very short duration use.

Those 18 CFLs are using 35,500 gallons of water.

In contrast, going with the 4:1 ratio since I have yet for a CFL to work as long as they say, incandescents that would be in those sockets would use 142,000 gallons of water. I'm guessing no one has ever figured this water use into how much an average household uses per day.

Further Reading On Our Water Problems

Here's an article that showing how we are putting ourselves into states of drought.
Here's one about Lake Superior shrinking. And no one really knows why. This might be part of the answer.

Mercury

And - a tidbit of an aside regarding mercury in CFL's - it doesn't match what is spewed out of power plants using coal (54% percent of our electricity is produced by coal, nationwide). The number? 48 tons of mercury per year from our coal electricity .

Labels: , , , ,

Sunday, September 28, 2008

Conserving At Home

Heating and Air Conditioning
Why You Insulate
Wood Burning
Homemade Solar Heater
Steps To Save Natural Gas
Fuel Oil Bill Assistance

Saving Gasoline
Become A Hyper-miler
Green Car Information
Bio Fuel and Other Information

Holidays and Special Occasions
A Green Halloween
Green Weddings
Green Christmas

Electric Savings
LED Solar Chandalier Project
Electronic Vampires
Reduce Your Home's Electric Use
WSJ Article on Energy Star Appliances
Drying Your Clothes
Refrigerator Madness

Reduce Your Water Needs
Irrigation Conservation
Greywater Use - will be expanded upon

Reducing Your Footprint and Bills
Don't Buy Bottled Water
Stop Using Fabric Softener
Non-Clay Kitty Litter Reviews
NYS Locavore Information
Compost!
Paper Towels
Green Cleaning
Recycling VHS Tapes
Protect Your Pollinators
Quit Using Air Freshners

Teaching The Kids

Gardens At School

Labels: , , , , , ,

Friday, September 19, 2008

Australian Drought

From Sidney News

AFTER years of claims and counter-claims, new figures show cotton became the thirstiest crop in the whole Murray-Darling Basin two years ago, guzzling 20 per cent of all the water used for agriculture in region.

A groundbreaking report on the Murray-Darling by the Australian Bureau of Statistics reveals cotton was "consistently the crop with the highest water consumption" from 2000-01 to 2005-06, followed by dairy farming, growing pasture for livestock and rice.

And in key districts such as the Gwydir River in northern NSW, cotton used a whopping 87 per cent of the agricultural water in 2006. The numbers from the Border Rivers catchment, covering southern Queensland, reveal a similar story, with cotton using more than 80 per cent of agricultural water from that system.

The head of Cotton Australia, Adam Kay, said the figures on water use by the cotton industry reflected a choice by farmers in those years to use their water allocations to grow the most profitable crops. But as the drought deepened and farmers' water allocations dropped, cotton production fell and last year saw the smallest crop in 30 years.

"This year wheat is almost as competitive as cotton," Mr Kay said yesterday.
The new report comes as the political fight intensified over how to save the vital region that holds almost 40 per cent of Australia's farms, produces all its rice crop, half its wheat and apples, almost all its oranges, most of its pigs and a large number of dairy cattle.

Yesterday the South Australian Premier, Mike Rann, wound up the pressure, saying that anyone illegally diverting water in the Murray-Darling during the crisis, was engaging in "terrorism".

Mr Rann said he would ask the next meeting of the Murray-Darling Basin Commission, which includes representatives from the state and federal governments, to impose jail sentences for large-scale water theft. "It is a criminal offence, and anyone siphoning water off illegally, in my view, should be locked up, rather than the fines that I am told are currently in place."

The Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, is battling claims that Queensland has seriously added to the basin's water crisis and is being bailed out by his Government, which is planning to step up the buyback of water entitlements from heavy using irrigators.

At Thursday's cabinet meeting in Adelaide Mr Rudd said he would hasten his planned $400 million water buyback in an effort to get more water flowing from Queensland and NSW to the mouth of the Murray in South Australia, where the Lower Lakes and the world-famous wetlands of the Coorong are in crisis.

He bowed to pressure from the independent senator Nick Xenophon for an independent audit of water in the struggling Murray-Darling system that flows from Queensland to South Australia, but is largely in NSW.

The plan to step up buybacks was called a "knee-jerk reaction driven by loud minority groups" by the Irrigators Council. So far, the buybacks have largely been on paper as there is little water to buy because of the drought and low dam levels.

Mr Rudd is examining, with state governments, buying big properties with high water use.
Environmental groups have welcomed the buybacks and the independent water audit.

The National Farmers Federation backed the plan but stressed there was little water to buy back. "People must understand there simply is no water available to pump into ailing systems," said Laurie Arthur, who chairs the federation's water taskforce.

Labels: , , , ,

Monday, August 18, 2008

Lake Baikal Article

BOLSHIYE KOTY, Russia (Aug. 10) - The world's oldest, deepest and biggest freshwater lake is growing warmer, dirtier and more crowded.

Lyubov Izmestieva is charting these insidious changes. Marina Rikhvanova is fighting them. And the fate of one of the world's rarest ecosystems, a turquoise jewel set in the vast Siberian taiga, hangs in the balance.

For centuries Lake Baikal has inspired wonder and, more recently, impassioned defenders. With more fresh water than the Great Lakes combined, and home to 1,500 species of plants and animals found nowhere else in the world, Baikal has been called Sacred Sea, Pearl of Siberia, Galapagos of Russia.

But these pristine waters, a mile deep in some places, are threatened by polluting factories, a uranium enrichment facility, timber harvesting, and, increasingly, Earth's warming climate. The struggle has turned nasty, with Rikhvanova, an environmental activist, claiming the authorities even dragooned her own son into a violent attack on her group.

Tourists, most of them newly prosperous Russians, are flocking to the lake, filling the beaches, building vacation dachas and changing the lake's ecology. Resorts are opening. There are more fishermen, hunters and boaters.

The lake's significance goes far beyond Russia's borders; its size and fragility, say environmentalists, makes it a sort of test case for such bodies of fresh water around the world.
"Baikal is the greatest lake in the world. It is a limitless reserve and source for water that all of humanity can drink without any sort of purification," says Izmestieva, a third-generation biologist. "This is a priceless gift for everyone, whether you live in Bolshiye Koty or Florida ... or Kansas."

Shimmering, crystalline waters lap at the hull of the boat named for Izmestieva's scientist grandfather, Mikhail Kozhov, as her colleagues sort plastic jugs and glass bottles and prepare for the day's work.

Lyudmila Ryabenka lowers a plate-sized disc into the rolling waves to measure transparency and quality. Then she winches a cone-shaped net deep into the lake to pull up phytoplankton -- tiny plants that are an essential food source for many fish and shellfish. Later, she and another biologist use a glass cylinder to measure water temperature and collect animal plankton samples.
On the return to the ramshackle village of Bolshiye Koty, Ryabenka says the sampling is sometimes tedious. When the boat pitches or the Siberian winter winds howl, it's even harder. "We say that only romantics do this sort of work."

But every week to 10 days, four seasons a year, for more than 60 years, Izmestiva's family and their colleagues has kept at it.

Izmestiva, 56, the gruff-spoken director of Irkutsk State University's Scientific Research Institute of Biology, is the third generation in her family to do this work. Starting in 1945, her grandfather sailed out onto Baikal's waters -- or trudged out on its ice -- to take samples. When he died, Izmestieva's mother continued the work until her death in 2000. Izmestiva then took over.

Taking the samples became a family ritual, she says. "There's a kind of work that just has to be done whether you like it or not. ... And it's just worked out that we're the ones who have to do it."

The result has been a remarkable trove of data published in the U.S. journal Global Change Biology in an extraordinary paper that concluded Baikal is warming and its food web changing. That echoes other evidence of climate change, including thinning lake ice, arriving later and leaving earlier.

Izmestieva and her colleagues supplement small academic salaries (around $200 a month) consulting for private companies. They store samples in old champagne and vodka bottles. Their work space is the porch of a tired-looking shore-side cabin in Bolshiye Koty.

Now, the university rector wants to rent out the institute's cabins to tourists. That, Izmestieva says, would likely deprive the scientists of a base from which to monitor the lake's changing nature.

"No one will do this if we don't," she says.

Some 20 to 30 million years ago, scientists believe, a rift in the Earth's crust created Baikal's 400-mile-long, sickle-shaped basin.

Today the lake near the Mongolian border, 2,600 miles east of Moscow, contains one-fifth of the world's fresh water, enough to provide Earth's 7 billion people with six cups of water a day for the next 6,000 years.

It's a sprawling outdoor laboratory of biological diversity comparable to the rich fauna of the Galapagos Islands. Geologists come to study the formation of the Asian continent. Biologists probe such mysteries as how a lake 1,000 miles inland became home to the world's only true species of freshwater seals.

Last month two small, manned submarines reached the bottom of the lake with scientists on board to take soil and water samples. The 5,223-foot dive fell just short of setting a world record.

Baikal inspired the Soviet Union's environmental movement in the 1960s, after Izmestieva's grandfather and other scientists spoke out against Nikita Khrushchev's plans to build a pulp and paper factory on its shores.

Today Marina Rikhvanova, who helped found the nonprofit group Baikal Ecological Wave, is still fighting to close the mill, which has created a dead zone miles wide in the lake and may be contaminating the seals.

A few years back her group led protests against a 2,700-mile oil pipeline, part of which would run along the lake's northern shores. The group's books were audited by authorities, its computers seized and its phones tapped -- retaliation, she says, for fighting the pipeline.

In 2006, then President Vladimir Putin ordered the pipeline rerouted, a rare victory for Russian environmentalists that earned Rikhvanova international accolades. This year she won a prestigious, $150,000 award from the U.S.-based Goldman Foundation.

The 47-year-old former scientist says the victory demonstrates Baikal's potency as a symbol.
The lake "is an indicator of whether modern man can curb his appetite and preserve what nature has created," she says, surrounded by shelves of maps, nature guides and scientific papers. "It's a kind of red line for humanity."

Now she's taking on Kremlin plans to build a uranium enrichment facility 60 miles west of the lake, which would produce nuclear fuel. Officials say the project would bring thousands of jobs to this poor region. Environmentalists say it's a grave mistake that would threaten a natural wonder with radiation.

A year ago Rikhvanova helped organize a tent camp protest not far from the site of the proposed facility. Skinhead nationalists attacked the camp and beat the protesters, one fatally.
Rikhvanova's son, Pavel, was among the intruders, although he denies hurting anyone. She alleges that authorities set up her son in an effort to embarrass her organization. Prosecutors officials refused to comment. Pavel remains in custody.

Despite her personal pain, she says, she is not about to give up. Baikal is too important. "When you see results from your work, you want to continue," she says. "You have to persevere."

Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, May 7, 2008

UN News May 7

BUSINESS LEADERS WITH UN GLOBAL COMPACT URGE ACTION ON WATER CRISIS
New York, May 7 2008 12:00PM
Governments of the Group of Eight (G8) countries need to take urgent action on the emerging global crisis in water and sanitation, say business leaders from some of the world’s largest companies who have endorsed the United Nations Global Compact.

In a letter released today by the UN Global Compact Office, the chief executive officers of 19 corporations call on G8 leaders to actively address the issue of water during their upcoming summit in Japan in July. The business leaders are all endorsers of the UN Global Compact’s CEO Water Mandate, which was launched by Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon last year.

“It is increasingly clear that lack of access to clean water and sanitation in many parts of the world causes great suffering in humanitarian, social, environmental and economic terms, and seriously undermines development goals,” the letter states.

It is estimated that approximately one billion people lack access to safe drinking water, and 2.6 billion do not have access to adequate sanitation. The letter cites a recent UN Development Report, which argues that the costs to sub-Saharan African economies of not having basic universal access to water and sanitation represent about five per cent of gross domestic product.
“Water is not just an environmental issue – it is a poverty and development issue, an economic issue, and therefore a business issue,” the chief executives state.

The letter notes that in 2000, world leaders committed to the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), including a concrete target to “halve, by 2015, the proportion of people without sustainable access to safe drinking water and basic sanitation.”

“We are pleased that business leaders have taken the initiative and are urging governments to take seriously this emerging crisis,” said Georg Kell, Executive Director of the UN Global Compact.

The Global Compact pledges participating businesses – now numbering some 3,600 in over 100 countries – to observe principles regarding human rights, labour rights, environmental sustainability and the fight against corruption.
2008-05-07 00:00:00.000

Labels: , ,

Thursday, December 20, 2007

Good News Articles

10/30 More Information on Energy Bills - Conservation - activism
12/20 - updated Energy Bill 2007 Needs Your Help - Conservation - activism
9/30 Binghamton NY Getting Greener - Conservation
9/30 Trash Talk - Recycling
9/15 Top 15 Environmental Religious Leaders - Conservation
9/15 More Top 15 Environmental Lists - Conservation

Labels: , , ,

Ideas For Conserving At Home

12/20 Green Christmas Ideas - Collective
12/20 Focus The Nation - Education
11/9 Electronic Vampires - Electric
10/30 Green Cars - Gasoline
10/30 A Green Halloween - Misc
10/2 Be a "HyperMiler" - Gasoline
10/30 - Green Car Information - Gasoline
9/20 LED Solar Chandalier Project - Electric
10/24 Storm Window Solar Panel - Heat
9/10 Greywater Use - will be expanded upon - Water
9/4Fuel Oil - Heat
9/3 Gardening and Community Gardening - Food
8/30 Steps To Save NG - Natural Gas
This Old House - Dozens of Articles - Misc
8/29 Why You Insulate - HVAC
8/18 Processing Your Own Food - Food
8/14 The Kyoto Protocol - Misc
7.13 Irrigation Conservation - Water
Reduce Your Home's Electric Use - Electric
WSJ Article on Energy Star Appliances - Electric
Updated 10/19 Don't Buy Bottled Water - Water and Petrolium
Bio Fuel and Other Information
Indoor Water Conservation - Water
Choose The Right Toilet - Water

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, November 29, 2007

Bad Environmental News

Red Dates are New Articles within the last week
Green Dates are Updated within the last week

11/29 How the US is Reusing Depleted Uranium - Nuclear
11/12 Black Sea Disaster - Petrolium
11/11 Mercury Among Us - Land Destruction
11/10 Chemicals For Vanity - Home Environment
11/8 Concerns About Lead - Home Environment
11/1 TN Town Runs Out of Water - Global Warming, Water Management
10/2 US Coast Guard Not Ready For Expanding Sea Global Warming
9/30 Yellow Frog Extinction - Land Destruction
9/15 Arctic Sea Melts - Global Warming
8/14 A Ubiquitous Chemical - Industry
7/28 Lake Superior Shrinking - Global Warming
7/6 NASA Scientist Predicts Rapid Ice Sheet Melt - Global Warming

Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Ideas For Conserving At Work

11/28 Lighting A Business - NY only
11/9 Electronic Vampires Electric
10/30 Green Cars Gasoline
10/30 Energy Bill - Misc
8 Ways to Save - Misc
10/24 Storm Window Solar Panel - Heat
9/4Fuel Oil - Heat
8/30 Steps For Business To Save NG - Natural Gas
Information for Worship Centers - Misc
Irrigation Conservation - Water
Choose The Right Toilet - Water

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, November 6, 2007

TN Town Ran Out Of Water

Tennessee Town Runs Out of Water
By GREG BLUESTEIN,
Posted: 2007-11-01 22:30:40
Filed Under: Nation News
ORME, Tenn. (Nov. 1) - As twilight falls over this Tennessee town, Mayor Tony Reames drives up a dusty dirt road to the community's towering water tank and begins his nightly ritual in front of a rusty metal valve.With a twist of the wrist, he releases the tank's meager water supply, and suddenly this sleepy town is alive with activity. Washing machines whir, kitchen sinks fill and showers run.

About three hours later, Reames will return and reverse the process, cutting off water to the town's 145 residents.The severe drought tightening like a vise across the Southeast has threatened the water supply of cities large and small, sending politicians scrambling for solutions. But Orme, about 40 miles west of Chattanooga and 150 miles northwest of Atlanta, is a town where the worst-case scenario has already come to pass: The water has run out.The mighty waterfall that fed the mountain hamlet has been reduced to a trickle, and now the creek running through the center of town is dry.

Three days a week, the volunteer fire chief hops in a 1961 fire truck at 5:30 a.m. - before the school bus blocks the narrow road - and drives a few miles to an Alabama fire hydrant. He meets with another truck from nearby New Hope, Ala. The two drivers make about a dozen runs back and forth, hauling about 20,000 gallons of water from the hydrant to Orme's tank.

"I'm not God. I can't make it rain. But I'll get you the water I can get you," Reames tells residents.Between 6 and 9 every evening, the town scurries. Residents rush home from their jobs at the carpet factories outside town to turn on washing machines. Mothers start cooking supper. Fathers fill up water jugs. Kids line up to take showers.

"You never get used to it," says Cheryl Evans, a 55-year-old who has lived in town all her life. "When you're used to having water and you ain't got it, it's strange. I can't tell you how many times I've turned on the faucet before remembering the water's been cut."

"You have to be in a rush," she says. "At 6 p.m., I start my supper, turn on my washer, fill all my water jugs, take my shower."

During its peak in the 1930s, Orme (rhymes with "storm") boasted a population of thousands, a jail, three schools and a hotel. But those boom times are long gone.

After the coal miners went on strike in the 1940s, the company shut down the mine and the town has never been the same. Not a single business is left in Orme. The only reminder of the town's glory days is an aging wooden rail depot that sits three feet above the eerily quiet streets.

Although changes are coming - cable TV arrived just a few years ago - cell phones still don't work there. The main road into town is barely wide enough for two cars to pass one another. Dogs wander the streets, farm animals can be heard all around town, and kids gather outside the one-room City Hall to ride their bikes.

"It's like walking back in time. It's Never-Never Land here," says Ernie Dawson, a 47-year-old gospel singer who grew up in Orme.

Water restrictions in Orme are nothing new. But residents say it's never been this bad.

Even last summer, as the water supply dwindled, city leaders cut off water only at night. But in August, Reames took the most extreme step yet and restricted use to three hours a day.

Elected in December, he has now spent $8,000 of the city's $13,000 annual budget to deal with the crisis. Most of the money went toward trucking water from Alabama.

He has tried to fill the gaps with modest fundraisers, but it hasn't been easy. A Halloween carnival last week cleared about $375 and a dog show two weeks ago made $300.

The town has received a $377,590 emergency grant from the U.S. Department of Agriculture that Reames hopes will be Orme's salvation. A utility crew is laying a 2 1/2-mile pipe to connect Orme to the Bridgeport, Ala., water supply. The work could be finished by Thanksgiving.

"It's not a short-term solution," Reames says. "It is THE solution."

He says the crisis in Orme could serve as a warning to other communities to conserve water before it's too late.

"I feel for the folks in Atlanta," he says, his gravelly voice barely rising above the sound of rushing water from the town's tank. "We can survive. We're 145 people. You've got 4.5 million people down there. What are they going to do? It's a scary thought."


11/6 - From The Grist.org

The Weight of Water U.S. states face water shortages The catastrophic California wildfires got all the press, but it's worth paying attention to an equally intimidating but slower-moving threat: water shortages. From Georgia to Massachusetts, Florida to New York, the Great Lakes to the West, U.S. states are getting thirstier. In fact, the government predicts that at least 36 states will face challenges from inadequate water supplies within five years, thanks to a combination of rising temperatures, drought, population growth, sprawl, waste, and overuse. "Is it a crisis? If we don't do some decent water planning, it could be," says Jack Hoffbuhr of the American Water Works Association. Officials hope that measures such as water recycling, efficiency, and desalination will save the day. In the meanwhile, local officials are tightening their grasp on any available supplies, and debates over how to address the problem are simmering.

Theory From Leslie
http://kermitsteam.blogspot.com/2007/09/theory-on-drought-monitoring.html

Another Theory From Leslie
http://kermitsteam.blogspot.com/2007/08/desertification-theory.html

Labels: , , ,

Saturday, October 27, 2007

Editorial Letter Water Management

Sending this to my local paper. 142 words - well within parameters of most papers...

To Whom It May Concern:

Our nation is running out of potable water. Rivers are failing to reach the ocean. The Great Lakes are shrinking. Aquifers are drying up. Locally, streams run dry annually - unheard of in our parents’ youth.

Overuse, single-use, and rapid runoff are all to blame. Each can be remedied if people know how and why. The news media, meteorologists specifically, must increase their role to educate and not just pontificate.

Redefine drought to include more variables than precipitation. Explain impervious ground cover and ways to lessen its impact. Teach proper irrigation (including NO irrigation) to the entire community. Introduce reuse (greywater) for many water needs.

Our children will see the day when water is sold on the world market much as oil is today. It is already happening in the Plain States and South West.

Let’s change that starting here and now.

Sincerely,


Resources
http://www.earth-policy.org/Books/Out/ch6_water.pdfhttp://narsal.ecology.uga.edu/atl_landcover/landcover.html

Labels: , , ,