The Spiraling Homestead

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

Earth Hour March 28, 2009

Earth Hour is 10 days away. Go to the website and sign up so they know how many people are going to participate.

From 830 to 930 PM, all you have to do is turn off your lights. That's it. Incredibly simple!
Organizations, schools, cities, towns, and businesses can all sign up. And if you leave the name of your organization, it'll be scrolled across the website sidebar! Very cool.
You have nothing to lose except a little reading time. Why not join 28 Scouts in this effort? Or the 2.2 million in Sydney Australia? It's worth it! And hey - make it a habit!

Labels: , ,

Friday, February 13, 2009

Shock Absorbers Harvesting Energy

Paul sent me this article. My brother and I have been discussing the huge potential of micro-harvesting energy, rather than the large-scale production of energy that our country has relied upon for so long. By diversifying the system, the ability to cripple the country is greatly diminished. This research will have far reaching implications, which is wonderful!

ScienceDaily (Feb. 13, 2009) — A team of MIT undergraduate students has invented a shock absorber that harnesses energy from small bumps in the road, generating electricity while it smoothes the ride more effectively than conventional shocks. The students hope to initially find customers among companies that operate large fleets of heavy vehicles. They have already drawn interest from the U.S. military and several truck manufacturers.

Senior Shakeel Avadhany and his teammates say they can produce up to a 10 percent improvement in overall vehicle fuel efficiency by using the regenerative shock absorbers. The company that produces Humvees for the army, and is currently working on development of the next-generation version of the all-purpose vehicle, is interested enough to have loaned them a vehicle for testing purposes.

The project came about because "we wanted to figure out where energy is being wasted in a vehicle," senior Zack Anderson explains. Some hybrid cars already do a good job of recovering the energy from braking, so the team looked elsewhere, and quickly homed in on the suspension

They began by renting a variety of different car models, outfitting the suspension with sensors to determine the energy potential, and driving around with a laptop computer recording the sensor data. Their tests showed "a significant amount of energy" was being wasted in conventional suspension systems, Anderson says, "especially for heavy vehicles."

Once they realized the possibilities, the students set about building a prototype system to harness the wasted power. Their prototype shock absorbers use a hydraulic system that forces fluid through a turbine attached to a generator. The system is controlled by an active electronic system that optimizes the damping, providing a smoother ride than conventional shocks while generating electricity to recharge the batteries or operate electrical equipment.

In their testing so far, the students found that in a 6-shock heavy truck, each shock absorber could generate up to an average of 1 kW on a standard road -- enough power to completely displace the large alternator load in heavy trucks and military vehicles, and in some cases even run accessory devices such as hybrid trailer refrigeration units.

They filed for a patent last year and formed a company, called Levant Power Corp., to develop and commercialize the product. They are currently doing a series of tests with their converted Humvee to optimize the system's efficiency. They hope their technology will help give an edge to the military vehicle company in securing the expected $40 billion contract for the new army vehicle called the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle, or JLTV.

"They see it as something that's going to be a differentiator" in the quest for that lucrative contract, says Avadhany. He adds, "it is a completely new paradigm of damping."

"This is a disruptive technology," Anderson says. "It's a game-changer."

"Simply put -- we want this technology on every heavy-truck, military vehicle and consumer hybrid on the road," Avadhany says.

The team has received help from MIT's Venture Mentoring Service, and has been advised by Yet-Ming Chiang, the Kyocera Professor of Ceramics in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering and founder of A123 Systems, a supplier of high-power lithium-ion batteries.

Not only would improved fuel efficiency be a big plus for the army by requiring less stockpiling and transportation of fuel into the war zone, but the better ride produced by the actively controlled shock absorbers make for safer handling, the students say. "If it's a smoother ride, you can go over the terrain faster," says Anderson.

The new shocks also have a fail-safe feature: If the electronics fail for any reason, the system simply acts like a regular shock absorber.

The group, which also includes senior Zachary Jackowski and alumni Paul Abel '08, Ryan Bavetta '07 and Vladimir Tarasov '08, plans to have a final, fine-tuned version of the device ready this summer. Then they will start talking to potential big customers. For example, they have calculated that a company such as Wal-Mart could save $13 million a year in fuel costs by converting its fleet of trucks.

Labels: , , ,

Sunday, December 28, 2008

Utility Bill Savings

Since I moved back to my parents' house in 2001, I've been doing what I can to make the house more energy efficient. All 3 of us are on very limited incomes now and so must conserve the collective monies in any way possible.

One problem being, they are elderly and are getting cold at warmer temperatures. This means each year, the average indoor temperature goes up about a degree. And with Mom's heart/lung issues, she needs AC in the summer for air quality as much as temperature. So AC is turned on at cooler outdoor temps.

Conserving with parameters like these is a challenge! However, with a 140 y.o. house, it's not as bad as it could be. I'm getting close to maxing out on improvements, but I have about another year of major work before I'm struggling to find ways to bring the numbers down.

My natural gas (NG) and electric (E) numbers go back to 2004. Unfortunately, I've not found the bills for prior to 2004, although I'm certain my mom has kept them somewhere. It's just a matter of finding them.

2004 we added a new roof, which meant some more attic insulation, peak vents, better underlayment - the new roof is in the picture above...
So, 2004 numbers
NG total 1606 btu's
E total 12,595 kwh's
CO2 in Metric Tons - 13.07

WOW - are those horrid numbers or WHAT? Perspective - it's about 1000 sf.

In 2005, we resided it. Sorry - vinyl. We couldn't afford anything different. I believe we also got the new gas stove and furnace, which the numbers reflect...
The numbers for 2005
NG - 1127
E - 11309
CO2 - 10.37
Late in 2005, so the numbers are reflected more in 2006, we insulated an unheated space of the house, the cellarway. It went from hideous to fab (by comparison) in a month. Life can be that good sometimes!
We weren't able to add a lot of insulation, but a new window was put in, a new door, a new storm door, drywall and caulking continues as I find new cracks to fill.

This, along with the addition of CFLs to most of our lighting, was all we could do for the house. I turned my attention to landscaping for 2006.
Some of the improvements helped with the heating and cooling of the house, but mostly beautification and reducing the amount of lawn to be mowed.
2006 numbers
NG 1268 (up, but winter was brutal)
E 9377 (down!)
CO2 - 10.42

2007 turned into the year life was put on hold. Mom had her heart attack April 1, and is still undergoing stent placement 18 months later. I did little more than trying to keep the house running since she was fully unable, I'm barely able and Dad is oblivious/unable. LOL I did get some more of the attic insulated with radiant barrier, but that was it.
2007 Numbers
NG 1315
E 9832
CO2 - 10.85
More heating and more AC due to the illness.
And finally 2008 rolled around. It's been the year of weather extremes. Hot, dry, cold, snow. And that was just April. But truly, we had many more days to AC and to heat than the previous 2 years, so I was certain we'd be headed for trouble.
However, we were able to remodel Dad's bedroom, which meant ripping out the lath and plaster, insulating fully and making it look like something other than a 140 y.o. attic space.



Yes, those are plank walls.
With the added insulation all the way around, his room accounts for almost 25% of the roofline. A mighty big chunk to be insulating. And WOW did it help during the summer! The upstairs stayed cooler when I added the reflective barrier stuff to crawl spaces - by almost 10 degrees. This decreased it another 15. So rather than being 100 on an 80 degree day, it was 80 at 4 in the afternoon on an 85 degree day.
The house needed to stay as cool as before, but the AC didn't run half as much because of the house staying cooler all by itself.
This winter, I have better wood to use in the woodstove, which is poorly placed to be heating the entire house (and so doesn't). The pieces are smaller, which makes it far easier for me to control the heat output. And, I've finally installed those programmable thermostats I bought a year ago. Both factors keep Dad from playing with the heat as much - at all really.
I also purchased a spin dryer. I know solar dryers are the best, but with all of the disabilities in the house, the electric dryer is really necessary. So, by spin drying, I can remove up to 2 quarts of water from the clothes before they hit the dryer. All for 300 watts. Drying time is halved, saving us a ton in electricity.
2008 Numbers
NG 1204
E 8079
CO2 - 9.59 - WOOO below 10!
A decrease of 8% year to year for NG and 18% for E. WOW
Natural Gas Numbers
2004 - 1606
2005 - 1127
2006 - 1268
2007 - 1315
2008 - 1204
Electric Numbers
2004 - 12595
2005 - 11309
2006 - 9377
2007 - 9832
2008 - 8079
The amount of money saved for this year alone, from 2004's numbers to 2008's numbers is nearly 1G. Amazingly, electric is within 1 penny of the 2004 cost. So, even though that's seen such a dramatic decrease in use, it's not as dramatic for cost savings as the NG. But, any savings is more than worth it to me!
I also know they were paying more per month for their utilities in 2001 than I am paying now, so there has been at least a halving of the amount used over the last 7 years.
The savings are being put back into the house - we'll be redoing my room next. It's on the NW side of the house, no insulation, storm windows that don't really work, and receives the full brunt of winter wind - even with the landscaping I've done.
It should be interesting to see what savings we accrue this coming year. It makes me very excited!

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

Americans Using Less Electric!

It's about time! I guess everyone has switched over to CFL's! LOL - poor electric companies. I do feel for them. Yeah, right! From the WSJ

An unexpected drop in U.S. electricity consumption has utility companies worried that the trend isn't a byproduct of the economic downturn, and could reflect a permanent shift in consumption that will require sweeping change in their industry.

Numbers are trickling in from several large utilities that show shrinking power use by households and businesses in pockets across the country. Utilities have long counted on sales growth of 1% to 2% annually in the U.S., and they created complex operating and expansion plans to meet the needs of a growing population.

"We're in a period where growth is going to be challenged," says Jim Rogers, chief executive of Duke Energy Corp. in Charlotte, N.C.

The data are early and incomplete, but if the trend persists, it could ripple through companies' earnings and compel major changes in the way utilities run their businesses. Utilities are expected to invest $1.5 trillion to $2 trillion by 2030 to modernize their electric systems and meet future needs, according to an industry-funded study by the Brattle Group. However, if electricity demand is flat or even declining, utilities must either make significant adjustments to their investment plans or run the risk of building too much capacity. That could end up burdening customers and shareholders with needless expenses.

To be sure, electricity use fluctuates with the economy and population trends. But what has executives stumped is that recent shifts appear larger than others seen previously, and they can't easily be explained by weather fluctuations. They have also penetrated the most stable group of consumers -- households.

Dick Kelly, chief executive of Xcel Energy Inc., Minneapolis, says his company, which has utilities in Colorado and Minnesota, saw home-energy use drop 3% in the period from August through September, "the first time in 40 years I've seen a decline in sales" to homes. He doesn't think foreclosures are responsible for the trend.

Duke Energy Corp.'s third-quarter electricity sales were down 5.9% in the Midwest from the year earlier, including a 9% drop among residential customers. At its utilities operating in the Carolinas, sales were down 4.3% for the three-month period ending Sept. 30 from a year earlier.
American Electric Power Co., which owns utilities operating in 11 states, saw total electricity consumption drop 3.3% in the same period from the prior year. Among residential customers, the drop was 7.2%. However, milder weather played a role.

Utility executives question whether the recent declines are primarily a function of the broader economic downturn. If that's the case, says Xcel's Mr. Kelly, then utilities should continue to build power plants, "because when we come out of the recession, demand could pick up sharply" as consumers begin to splurge again on items like big-screen televisions and other gadgets.
Some feel that the drop heralds a broader change for the industry. Mr. Rogers of Duke Energy says that even in places "where prices were flat to declining," his company still saw lower consumption. "Something fundamental is going on," he says.

Michael Morris, the chief executive of AEP, one of the country's largest utilities, says he thinks the industry should to be wary about breaking ground on expensive new projects. "The message is: be cautious about what you build because you may not have the demand" to justify the expense, he says.

Utilities are taking steps to get a better understanding of the cause. Some are asking customers who reduced usage to explain what is influencing them. Xcel and other utilities, for example, have been running environmentally focused campaigns to urge consumers to use less energy recently, a message that might be taking hold.

Power companies are also questioning the reliability of the weather-adjustment models they use to harmonize fluctuating sales from quarter to quarter. "It's more art than science," says Bill Johnson, Chief Executive of Progress Energy Inc., Raleigh, N.C.

If the sector is entering a period of lower demand -- which could accelerate further if the automotive sector collapses -- many utilities will have to change the way they cover their costs.
Utilities are taking a hard look at the way they set rates and generate profits. Many companies are embracing a new rate design based on "decoupling," in which they set prices aimed at covering the basic costs of delivery, with sales above that level being gravy. Regulators have resisted the change in some places, because it typically means that consumers using little energy pay somewhat higher rates.

Labels: ,

Friday, November 21, 2008

Windmill Tech News

Both of these reports were found in the Farm Show magazine, volume 32 No 5.

Windmill in a Box at Retail Stores Soon
A new wind turbine from EarthTronics produces up to 2kW of energy, with only 20 inch blades. The super efficient, ready to go turbine is designed for easy installation and low maintenance. And it's priced to be affordable.

The president of EarthTronics wants to be able to mount it anywhere from a rootop to a pole and generate 20% or more of your home energy needs for about 2 grand.

The turbine is gearless and doesn't need a separate generator. The 6 blades revolved, acting as rotors, with the rim acting as the armature. This means electricity is produced at tip speed, not hub speed, like traditional windmills. They start rotating at 2 mph and reach max output at 15 mph.

If you'd like more information, contact EarthTronics Inc 200 Viridian Dr Muskegon, MI 49440 866 632 7840 or
info @ earthtronics.com
www.earthtronics.com

Windspire Produces Low-Cost Energy

Windspire from Mariah Power is a 1.2 kW 30' tall, 4' diameter unit that spins in position.
The straight blade Darrieus design was introduced in June of 2008 and can produce 2,000 kW per year at an average windspeed of 12 mph.

It's designed as a self-started, works at low speeds or up to 100 mph winds.

The spire costs 5000 and another 1000 to install.

The company is also designing another, larger spire that will produce twice the energy at 2/3 the wind speed.

For more information contact
Mariah Power 748 S Meadows Parkway A-9, #329, Reno NV 89521
www.MariahPower.com

A "Wingmill"
Instead of a spinning blade, the Wind Wing is a horizontal blade that pivots up and down on a lever that drives a generator. The wind Wing is parallel to the ground until a breeze blows by.

W2Energy Development Corp says it works like your hand when you hold it out the car window. The wind pushes your hand up or down, depending on the angle you hold your hand.

It's a wing system on a lever 10' from the fulcrum or mount with a balancing weight 1' past the fulcrum. The force needed to move the lever up and down is used to drive the generator to produce electtricity. A sensor will change the direction of the leading adge of the wing as it reaches the top or botoom of the stroke. A weather vane keeps the wing pointed directly into the wind at all times. (the picture looks like bi-plane wings stacked on a pole)

They are projecting it will cost up to 80% less than a traditional propller style windmill.

The company is also working on a Water Wing that will work with river and ocean currents.

For more Information Contact
W2 Energy Development Corp 50 Castilian Dr Suite 2, Santa Barbara, CA 93117 or
ron.pretlac @ W2EnergyCorp.com
www.W2EnergyCorp.com

Labels: , ,

Sunday, September 28, 2008

Conserving At Home

Heating and Air Conditioning
Why You Insulate
Wood Burning
Homemade Solar Heater
Steps To Save Natural Gas
Fuel Oil Bill Assistance

Saving Gasoline
Become A Hyper-miler
Green Car Information
Bio Fuel and Other Information

Holidays and Special Occasions
A Green Halloween
Green Weddings
Green Christmas

Electric Savings
LED Solar Chandalier Project
Electronic Vampires
Reduce Your Home's Electric Use
WSJ Article on Energy Star Appliances
Drying Your Clothes
Refrigerator Madness

Reduce Your Water Needs
Irrigation Conservation
Greywater Use - will be expanded upon

Reducing Your Footprint and Bills
Don't Buy Bottled Water
Stop Using Fabric Softener
Non-Clay Kitty Litter Reviews
NYS Locavore Information
Compost!
Paper Towels
Green Cleaning
Recycling VHS Tapes
Protect Your Pollinators
Quit Using Air Freshners

Teaching The Kids

Gardens At School

Labels: , , , , , ,

Thursday, August 28, 2008

Utility Bills

I can't imagine how people bordering on poverty are making it! I also can't understand the government's claim that no more people have fallen into poverty this past year.

For the last 2 years, I've paid our utility bills. I finally got my finances straightened out enough to take over that largest bill of the house.

Since I've been home (7 years), I've worked to make the house more energy efficient. I've strived to shave 5% off both gas and electric each year. You can imagine this might be difficult!

However, in THIS house, it has been rather easy. In fact, I'll be able to continue that trend for at least 2 more years, and all with simple changes. Some have cost, but have been simple.

Since 2004, our natural gas use has decreased by 50%, and electric by 40%. This last year has seen a drop of natural gas by 6% and electric by 11%.

More insulation in the walls, new siding, a new roof, new stove, new dishwasher, new washing machine, new freezer and some recently added insulation to the roof line have all added up to huge savings. Each new appliance has paid for itself in its savings, especially at today's prices.

The numbers for 2008 are horrifying. Since January, here in NYS, natural gas prices have tripled, electric has jumped 67%. Most families look forward to the summer as a reprieve from high utility costs. But with increases like these, they've not seen their bills go down and may have actually seen them go up. Can you imagine the panic they must be feeling knowing the worst is yet to come in a heating season that's only a few weeks away?

I can not imagine.

I still have much work to do in this house. Still simple, only 1 expensive purchase left, and some good old fashioned hard work to keep making a 150 year old house more energy efficient.

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

Your Fridge And Your Bills

Home is where the fridge is.

Whether it's a top-freezer or side-by-side model, in stainless steel, bisque, or black, that big box in the kitchen is on the job 24-7, rescuing us from hunger, boredom, warm beer, and cravings for Chunky Monkey.Refrigerators made pre-2000, alas, tend to be major energy hogs that waste watts and money. Add to that the unhealthy, unsustainable stuff so many of us stock inside our refrigerators, and the big box starts looking like an eco-villain.To start reforming your fridge -- and make it earth-friendlier, inside and out -- just take a few of the steps that follow. (Check out our handy resources, too.)

Raise the bar. Hey, we said we'd give you easy steps, right? So consider this: Green beer isn't just for St. Patty's Day anymore. Stock your fridge year round with eco-conscious cold ones like Fat Tire Ale, made by the Colorado-based New Belgium Brewing Company, which runs on wind power, recycles everything from grain to keg caps, and keeps a sustainability specialist on staff.

How low should you go?
Check out the chill factor. Keep your fridge in the right place: away from the stove or sunny windows. And remember to check its thermostat. Optimum temperatures for victual safety and energy efficiency are between 36 and 38 degrees Fahrenheit for the main compartment and between 0 and 5 degrees Fahrenheit for the freezer. Freezer temps even five degrees colder than that can increase energy consumption by nearly 20 percent.

Don't eat poison. Buy organic whenever possible. If you do need to buy conventional produce, at least steer clear of the dirty dozen -- the fruits and veggies with the heaviest pesticide loads.

Be unconventional. Keep a list on your fridge of these eight additional troublemakers: conventional versions of milk, peanut butter, baby food, ketchup, corn, cottonseed oil, beef, and soy. Each month, pick one item off the list -- corn and its byproducts, for example -- and find a way to feast without it. You'll be reducing your household intake of toxins, pesticides, antibiotics, and hormones. The earth will be happier, too.

Pour yourself some H2 Whoa. There's oil in them thar plastic water bottles -- about 47 million gallons just to produce them for the U.S. market each year. The solution? Wean thyself! Tap water is safer, cleaner, cheaper, and more strictly regulated than the bottled varieties. So drink from the faucet or, for added tastiness and safety, use a water filter, fill up a pitcher, and voilà: you're good to glug. P.S. Refrigerators with water dispensers use more energy (sigh), but if you've got one, make good use of the great filtered H2O it gives.

Shop until you drop ... kilowatt-hours, that is. Today's energy-efficient fridges use as little as 250 to 600 kilowatt-hours per year and rack up $50 or less in annual energy bills. By comparison, a typical 1983 brand, according to the nifty Energy Star online calculator, uses 1,500 kilowatt-hours and costs $153 a year. Although they're worth it over the long haul, new units can cost $500 to $4,500 or more upfront. For that price, make sure to choose a model with theEnergy Star label. For added energy savings, go with a top-freezer or bottom-freezer variety, sized 25 cubic feet or less (avoid watt-wasting side-by-side types). And remember to recycle your old monolith: it's full of refrigerants that definitely aren't cool.

Labels: , ,

Friday, November 9, 2007

Electric Vampires

Sent to me by Tammy through Doug of Vestal UMC's Green Team:

By JULIE CARR SMYTH - Associated Press Writer

COLUMBUS, Ohio(AP) A force as insidious as Dracula is quietly sucking a nickel of every dollar's worth of the electricity that seeps from your home's outlets.

Insert the little fangs of your cell phone charger in the outlet and leave it there, phone attached: That's vampire electronics.

Allow your computer to hide in the cloak of darkness known as "standby mode" rather than shutting it off: That's vampire electronics.

The latest estimates show 5 percent of electricity used in the United States goes to standby power, a phenomenon energy efficiency experts find all the more terrifying as energy prices rise and the planet warms. That amounts to about $4 billion a year.

The percentage could rise to 20 percent by 2010, according to the U.S. Department of Energy.

In California, lawmakers passed a proposal last year _ dubbed the Vampire Slayers Act _ to add vampire electronics labels to consumer products, detailing how much energy a charger, computer, DVD player, PlayStation, microwave or coffee maker uses when on, off or in standby mode.

"It's something people don't know about," said Dave Walton, home ideas director for Direct Energy, a utility and energy services company that has one of its four main offices in Dublin, Ohio.

The issue is particularly pressing in Ohio, the nation's No. 1 emitter of toxic air emissions _ mostly from electricity production at the state's coal-fired power plants. Walton said skyrocketing energy costs mean everyone should worry about the vampires in the house.

The International Energy Agency has estimated standby energy use by vampire electronics at 200 to 400 terawatt-hours a year. The entire country of Italy consumes about 300 terawatt-hours of electricity each year, according to the agency.
Picture any appliance that displays a clock while otherwise idle, such as a microwave oven, coffee maker or DVD player. They constantly consume little bits of energy.

"About 40 percent of the electricity being used to power your home electronics is consumed while they are in that standby mode," Walton said. "If you just focus on that piece, you will be making a big step."

Ditto for things that charge, such as cell phones, PDAs, toothbrushes or portable tools, some of which trickle a charge even after the device that's charging is at capacity.

Some chargers halt the flow of current when it's not needed, which should happen automatically with chargers for lithium-ion batteries. If you're uncertain, Walton advises unplugging chargers when not in use.

He recommends hooking up your home computer system, including accessories like a printer or scanner, to a single power strip that can be easily switched off each night. He advises shutting off the other vampires too, though the inconvenience of resetting the clocks, channels and timers on those devices each morning will discourage most people.

The government-backed Energy Star program, coordinated jointly by the U.S. Department of Energy and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, identifies appliances that consume less energy.
If one in 10 American homes used only appliances endorsed through the program, the Energy Department estimates, it would reduce U.S. carbon emissions by the same amount as planting 1.7 million acres of trees.

From AboutMyPlanet.com

Vampire electronics suck! Literally! These are electronics that use energy even when seemingly turned off or idle. CNN recently did a video report about these electronics and found that even some washing machines, when you turn them off, still suck energy. Many homes have up to 50 vampire devises. For example, a turned on DVD player uses 11.32 watts, and when it's turned off it still uses about 6 watts of energy. A home computer uses around 60 watts in standby.

From GrinningPlanet.com

Exact figures on total losses to standby power are not available, but the most recent major survey on the subject estimated that in the United States, 5% of electricity usage is due to standby power. In Europe, the numbers run slightly higher: France at 7% and Germany and the Netherlands at 10% each. Australia comes in at 11%, Japan at 12%.

There's a cool little gadget available that can help you determine which of your plug-in items are the most inefficient power consumers. It's the Kill-A-Watt electricity usage monitor. You just plug it into the wall outlet and then plug your electrical device into the Kill-a-Watt monitor. It will allow you to assess how efficient the electrical device is. You can calculate the item's electrical cost by the day, week, month, or year to help you decide whether a more efficient model would save you money over time

The amount of standby power wasted varies among electronic equipment, but overall, the cost to consumers and businesses for all the electricity lost to vampire power in the US is estimated to be $4 billion annually. The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates the global energy consumption due to standby power at between 200-400 terawatts per year.

Not all of this vampire power is truly wasted—after all, many of the features in modern electronics that require standby power are either critical for proper functioning of the unit or are associated with desirable features. Most wasted standby power is consumed by inefficient power supplies and components that are getting power unnecessarily. An Australian study of global standby power usage in electronic devices estimated that electronics manufacturers could reduce vampire power by 30% right off the bat just by using existing, better technologies—and with minimal additional cost to consumers.

Labels: , , ,

Saturday, October 27, 2007

Editorial Letter Wind Turbine Highways

Microturbines would allow us to use our highways to create electricity. 133 words.

Let us become the Valley of Ingenuity. Let us make our highways more than just roads.

Sound-reducing walls will be built to improve the quality of life throughout the area, reducing the ubiquitous noise pollution.

Within these walls will be the electrical infrastructure for wind turbines. Variable speed micro-turbines will be placed along the traffic corridors using natural and man-made winds for power production. This electricity will power the lights, rest stops, and toll booths.

Prairie grasses will be planted in the greenways, filtering gross particulates and carbon dioxide from the air. It will be sold and harvested frequently to produce ethanol, helping fund further construction projects and create green business/jobs regionally.

Let us seize this opportunity to be at the forefront of ingenuity. It is an idea whose time is now.

Sincerely,

Labels: , , , , ,

Thursday, June 21, 2007

How Many Light Bulbs Does It Take To Change The World?

From: Issue 108 September 2006 Page 74 By: Charles Fishman Photographs By: Christopher Griffith

Sitting humbly on shelves in stores everywhere is a product, priced at less than $3, that will change the world. Soon. It is a fairly ordinary item that nonetheless cuts to the heart of a half-dozen of the most profound, most urgent problems we face. Energy consumption. Rising gasoline costs and electric bills. Greenhouse-gas emissions. Dependence on coal and foreign oil. Global warming

The product is the compact fluorescent lightbulb, a quirky-looking twist of frosted glass. In the energy business, it is called a "CFL," or an "energy saver." One scientist calls it an "ice-cream-cone spiral," because in its most-advanced, most-appealing version, it looks like nothing so much as a cone of swirled soft-serve ice cream.

Most people have some experience with swirl bulbs, but typically it hasn't been happy. In the early 1990s, you would step into a room in a business traveler's hotel, flip on the lights by the door and between the beds, turn on the desk lamp and the floor lamp, then stand in the gloom looking around and thinking, "There must be another switch somewhere that actually turns on the light." Every one of the bulbs flickering to life was a compact fluorescent--and five of them together didn't provide enough light to read the card listing the lineup of cable-TV channels.

For two decades, CFLs lacked precisely what we expect from lightbulbs: strong, unwavering light; quiet; not to mention shapes that actually fit in the places we use bulbs. Now every one of those problems has been conquered. The bulbs come on quickly; their light is bright, white, steady, and silent; and the old U-shaped tubes--they looked like bulbs from a World War II submarine--have mostly been replaced by the swirl. Since 1985, CFLs have changed as much as cell phones and portable music players.

One thing hasn't changed: the energy savings. Compact fluorescents emit the same light as classic incandescents but use 75% or 80% less electricity.

What that means is that if every one of 110 million American households bought just one ice-cream-cone bulb, took it home, and screwed it in the place of an ordinary 60-watt bulb, the energy saved would be enough to power a city of 1.5 million people. One bulb swapped out, enough electricity saved to power all the homes in Delaware and Rhode Island. In terms of oil not burned, or greenhouse gases not exhausted into the atmosphere, one bulb is equivalent to taking 1.3 million cars off the roads.

That's the law of large numbers--a small action, multiplied by 110 million.

The single greatest source of greenhouse gases in the United States is power plants--half our electricity comes from coal plants. One bulb swapped out: enough electricity saved to turn off two entire power plants--or skip building the next two.

Just one swirl per home. The typical U.S. house has between 50 and 100 "sockets" (astonish yourself: Go count the bulbs in your house). So what if we all bought and installed two ice-cream-cone bulbs? Five? Fifteen?

Says David Goldstein, a PhD physicist, MacArthur "genius" fellow, and senior energy scientist with the Natural Resources Defense Council: "This could be just what the world's been waiting for, for the last 20 years."

Swirl bulbs don't just work, they pay for themselves. They use so little power compared with old reliable bulbs, a $3 swirl pays for itself in lower electric bills in about five months. Screw one in, turn it on, and it's not just lighting your living room, it's dropping quarters in your pocket. The advantages pile up in a way to almost make one giddy. Compact fluorescents, even in heavy use, last 5, 7, 10 years. Years. Install one on your 30th birthday; it may be around to help illuminate your 40th.

In an era when political leaders and companies are too fainthearted to ask Americans to sacrifice anything for the greater good, the modern ice-cream swirl bulb requires no sacrifice. Buying and using it helps save the world--and also saves the customer money--with no compromise on quality. Selflessness and self-satisfaction, twirled into a single $3 purchase.

So far, the impact of compact fluorescents has been trivial, for a simple reason: We haven't bought them. In our outdated experience, they don't work well and they cost too much. Last year, U.S. consumers spent about $1 billion to buy about 2 billion lightbulbs--5.5 million every day. Just 5%, 100 million, were compact fluorescents. First introduced on March 28, 1980, swirls remain a niche product, more curiosity than revolution.

But that's about to change. It will change before our very eyes. A year from now, chances are that you yourself will have installed a swirl or two, and will likely be quite happy with them. In the name of conservation and good corporate citizenship, not to mention economics, one unlikely company is about haul us to the lightbulb aisle, reeducate us, and sell us a swirl: Wal-Mart.

In the next 12 months, starting with a major push this month, Wal-Mart wants to sell every one of its regular customers--100 million in all--one swirl bulb. In the process, Wal-Mart wants to change energy consumption in the United States, and energy consciousness, too. It also aims to change its own reputation, to use swirls to make clear how seriously Wal-Mart takes its new positioning as an environmental activist.

It's a bold goal, a remarkable declaration of Wal-Mart's intention to modernize and green up a whole line of business using market oomph. Teaming up with General Electric, which owns about 60% of the residential lightbulb market in the United States, Wal-Mart wants to single-handedly double U.S. sales for CFLs in a year, and it wants demand to surge forward after that.

Diane Lindsley, the hardware buyer who decides what goes in the lightbulb aisles at Wal-Mart, thinks 100 million swirls is perfectly reasonable. "Yes," she says, "it's rational, I think." Before she started buying bulbs for Wal-Mart just three years ago, Lindsley didn't even know what CFLs were. Now she pauses in a way that suggests the kind of determination Wal-Mart can bring to bear when its buyers decide they are going to sell Americans something. "We have plans in place to where it may not take that long."

GE, facing the prospect of mothballing a centurylong franchise in lightbulbs--well, GE is smiling and swallowing hard. "CFLs are taking off," says Robert Stuart, who heads consumer marketing at GE for lightbulbs. "No one has been as vocal about this recently as Wal-Mart. One hundred million bulbs in a year? It's an aggressive goal. GE will find a way to make sure they are able to do that."

GE, too, has launched a green business initiative: ecomagination, an effort to make environmentally sustainable technologies an ever-larger part of GE's business. Swirls fit well, despite the inevitable cannibalization. "The real issue is, if we don't do it, someone else will," says GE's ecomagination vice president, Lorraine Bolsinger, of Wal-Mart's effort to push CFLs. "It's old thinking to imagine that you can hold on to a business model and outsmart the consumer. You can't."

Steven Hamburg is an associate professor at Brown University, an expert on energy consumption and global warming who helped Wal-Mart think through the spiral-bulb strategy. "Can they change the game? Think how many games Wal-Mart has changed. There's no reason they can't change this game."

Fan-Fare
For Chuck Kerby, it was ceiling fans that made the impact of energy-saving swirl bulbs dramatically clear.

Kerby is a vice president and divisional merchandise manager at Wal-Mart for hardware and paint (and ceiling fans) for all of Wal-Mart's U.S. stores and supercenters. Lindsley is one of 12 buyers working for him. Kerby, who started out collecting shopping carts from the parking lot of Wal-Mart #189 in Kirksville, Missouri, 23 years ago, has known about CFLs for years. "I became aware of them when I would travel and go into a hotel room."

Last year, conversations started in Wal-Mart around the potential of swirls to save customers money on utility bills. "Somebody asked, 'What difference would it make if we changed the bulbs in the ceiling-fan display to CFLs?'" says Kerby. A typical Wal-Mart has 10 models of ceiling fans on display, each with four bulbs. Forty bulbs per store, 3,230 stores.

"Someone went off and did the math," says Kerby. "They told me we could save $6 million in electric bills by changing the incandescents to CFLs in more than 3,000 Wal-Marts. I couldn't believe it. I didn't know I was paying $6 million to light those fixtures. I said, that can't be right, go back and do the math again." The numbers came out the same the second time: savings of $6 million a year. "That, for me, was an 'I got it' moment."

It was Lee Scott, Wal-Mart's CEO, who started Kerby and Lindsley thinking about lightbulbs. "Last fall," says Kerby, "we had had two hurricanes"--Katrina and Rita--"we had oil production disrupted, we had millions of people displaced in the South, and at a Friday officer's meeting not long after Katrina, Lee Scott said, 'Our customers are hurting, our customers' dollar is not going as far as it could.' He challenged everyone in the room to find relevant rollbacks, to lower the price of living and make a difference for our customers." (Wal-Mart-ers really talk that way among themselves.)

In the wake of Katrina, Scott had asked his staff for a briefing on environmental issues, including global warming. One of the people he sat down with was Hamburg, the Brown professor who has won an award from the EPA for his ability to explain climate change.

"It was a very frank conversation," says Hamburg. Not much of a Wal-Mart shopper, he had looked at one piece of Wal-Mart's environmental performance before. In 1994, he critiqued Wal-Mart's first environmentally sensitive store. "As I told Lee, it was a lot of green-wash. He needed to do better....I said, 'What really matters is what's on the shelves. Wal-Mart's influence is much greater in the marketplace than in the built environment.'"

Hamburg has been working with CFLs since the 1980s, so that subject naturally was on the table with Scott. "I think he knew what they were," says Hamburg. "I said, 'It's a very direct return to your consumers, and it has a big positive impact on reducing carbon emissions. So let's do it. You do it.'"

The spirals, you could say, were converging. After Scott's exhortation at the Friday officers meeting, Kerby did what a lot of Wal-Mart-ers do when they need to think and reconnect. He went shopping at Wal-Mart.

"I went across the street to #100," says Kerby. "I thought about what people rebuilding would need, I thought about energy costs, I filled the cart, and I brought it all back to the office. I challenged the buyers to look for ways to save money on these important products." One item in his cart: a three-pack of GE compact fluorescents, 60-watt equivalents, for $9.58--$3.19 each. You could buy three four-packs of classic GE 60-watt bulbs for that price, 12 regulars for the price of one spiral.

To Diane Lindsley, her boss's point was crystal clear. "I called GE," says Lindsley. "We started negotiating."

Within two weeks, the price on a three-pack of GE spirals at Wal-Marts across the country was "rolled back" to $7.58. It was a 21% cut--although the bulbs were still $2.53 each, 10 times the cost of an ordinary bulb. The agreement with GE was for a 90-day price cut, to help out after Katrina.

Did it make a difference in CFL sales?

"Absolutely," says Lindsley. "Faster than I've ever seen it before. In days."

Then, in late October, says Kerby, "Our friend Oprah had a segment on her show talking about CFL lightbulbs. We didn't ask her to do that or anything. But there certainly is an Oprah factor out there. That show led to a tremendous sales increase in the category that we have maintained to this day." Month over month, Lindsley is selling double the number of spirals she did before Katrina.

It was a perfect swirl: Katrina, Rita, $70-a-barrel oil, price-chopping, corporate consciousness-raising, with Oprah's lightbulb club thrown in.

"What had started as, 'Let's do something to help the consumer for 90 days,' well, it became obvious this wasn't a 90-day strategy," says Kerby. "World events had changed the lightbulb category. The time had come for the energy-saving lightbulbs. It was going to be a different kind of product going forward."

Inside the Bulb
Incandescent lightbulbs and spiral lightbulbs make light in entirely different ways, and it is that difference that makes spirals so potent. In a classic 60-watt incandescent bulb, light comes from the little metal filament quivering inside the sealed glass bulb. Electricity passes through the metal thread, heating it to 2,300 degrees Celsius, and the filament glows with the heat and throws off light. Electricity creates heat, heat creates light. It's why incandescent bulbs are so hot--the glass is often 300 degrees. In the trade, incandescents are sometimes known as "a hot wire in a bottle."

Compact fluorescents are something else again. In a fluorescent bulb, the glass tube is filled with gas and a tiny dot of mercury. Electricity leaps off electrodes on either end of the tube and excites the mercury molecules, which have a special property: When so excited, they emit ultraviolet light. That invisible UV light strikes the bulb's phosphor coating, which itself gets excited and emits visible light, which shines out through the tube. Heat is much less of a factor--CFLs run at about 100 degrees.

Making the ionized fog bottled inside a CFL dance to the same steady tune as an incandescent has required a lot of research, and an electronics revolution. Early CFLs cost $25 per bulb (and still paid for themselves in electricity savings). The light they produced was bluish or pinkish, or varied; the phosphor coating had to be refined. The ballast--built into the bulb rather than in a separate fixture, as with traditional fluorescent tubes--hummed and didn't cycle the electricity quickly enough; it had to be made electronic and miniaturized. Costs came down, as did size. The same wizardry that gives us Hallmark birthday cards that play "Love and Happiness" makes possible CFLs at $2.60 instead of $25.

It is this--the way swirls make light--that saves so much energy. In an incandescent, only 5% to 10% of the electricity passing through the wire becomes visible light; the rest becomes heat and invisible UV light. The vibrating mercury vapor atoms in a fluorescent bulb produce light more efficiently than a tungsten filament. You get more photons for every watt of electricity pumped in. An old-fashioned incandescent makes 15 lumens per watt; a 60-watt bulb shines with 900 lumens. In a CFL, you get 60 lumens per watt. To get 900 lumens--to get the light you expect from a 60-watt bulb--you need only 15 watts.

A 60-watt classic bulb and a 15-watt swirl are identically bright--the swirl just uses 45 fewer watts.

The Swirl Cascade
What really revolutionizes the lightbulb experience, and the business itself, is a second quality of swirls, beyond their ability to squeeze more light from a kilowatt: their longevity.

The compact fluorescents that GE, Philips, and Sylvania are putting on shelves are rated to run for 8,000, 10,000, or 12,000 hours. Few bulbs in a home are lit more than four hours a day; at that rate, an 8,000-hour bulb lasts five-and-a-half years; a 12,000-hour bulb lasts eight years and three months. As swirls take hold, it will be a surprise, a novel event, when a lightbulb goes dark. Imagine all those hard-to-reach bulbs that need to be replaced every three months. From four times a year, to once a decade.

And the impact of swirls cascades outward. Since every CFL has the life span of 6, or 8, or 10 equivalent incandescent bulbs, if Wal-Mart alone sells 100 million swirls in the next year, it does away with the need for 100 million old-fashioned bulbs to be manufactured, packaged, shipped, bought, and discarded next year--and every year until 2012 or beyond.

How much is 100 million bulbs? It's 25 million classic GE four-packs. That many boxes of bulbs would fill 262 Wal-Mart tractor trailers, a ghost convoy of Wal-Mart trucks, loaded with nothing but lightbulbs, stretching 3.5 miles--a convoy that will never roll. Every year for six years--just from one bulb, this year. Not to mention the line of garbage trucks necessary to cart 100 million burned-out incandescent bulbs to the landfill.

What you don't make, of course, you never get to sell. As enthusiasm for compact fluorescents mounted in Bentonville, there were multiple strategy meetings between the Wal-Mart lightbulb people and the GE lightbulb people--including a conversation January 12 between Lee Scott and GE CEO Jeffrey Immelt in which swirls were a significant topic.

GE had launched its ecomagination business push in May 2005--neatly summarized by Lorraine Bolsinger: "Green can be green." Scott launched Wal-Mart's sustainability repositioning last October in a speech to his own executives. Understanding the power of the CFL, Scott told them, had helped him see that environmental problems are really a disaster like "Katrina in slow motion." Pledging to take Wal-Mart and its customers and suppliers down a new path, he declared, "Environmental problems are our problems."

Immelt and Scott agreed in January that a major push on swirls was in order. But strategic enthusiasm doesn't change a simple short-term fact: Every new energy-saving swirl you sell obliterates sales of six or eight of your classic product. Incandescents won't ever go away--we still use candles--in part because there are some places CFLs simply don't work well. They are not tiny or elegant enough to be chandelier bulbs. They do not work as accent lighting. But in as little as five years, if Wal-Mart sparks a significant conversion to swirls, the lightbulb business will be rocked.

Total unit sales could be half what they are now. In the short run, there's a bonanza: 95% of sockets in U.S. homes don't have swirls in them, and a billion of them, or more, could. At the moment, with CFLs selling for 10 times what regular bulbs do, there's no immediate loss of revenue or profit. But prices won't stay where they are for long. At Sam's Club, Wal-Mart's club-store division, GE swirls already sell at $12.73 for an eight-pack--$1.59 per bulb, or just six times the cost of old-fashioned bulbs. At that price, the economics change. Competition from other retailers will force the price even lower--especially because of what happens next.

Once a third of the sockets in U.S. homes have compact fluorescents--once you sell the bulge of conversion replacements--both incandescent sales and CFL sales will fall off a cliff. Incandescent bulb sales could be cut in half, because we won't use them any more. And after we've installed 1.5 billion swirls, we'll only be buying perhaps 200 million a year, because they're on a six- or eight-year replacement cycle. Executives at Wal-Mart are already imagining a day when the shelf space for lightbulbs is cut by 30% or 40%.

For Wal-Mart, the appeal of swirls is clear, even to GE executives. "Wal-Mart sees its customer putting more money in the gas tank, more into electrical bills--their customer is saying, 'I need some help,'" says Bolsinger. "They are very close to that. If they can help a customer save money in the long haul, that's money that comes back to Wal-Mart."

Once Wal-Mart decides to make swirls an important product, the appeal for GE also becomes clear. It's the power of the big dog: GE can either help Wal-Mart sell swirls, or some other lightbulb company will. In either case, GE's regular-bulb business shrivels. "The business case is pretty clear," says Bolsinger. "If we don't grab the market share of CFLs, we lose." The only way to survive creative destruction, in fact, is to get out in front of the tsunami, to catch the wave.

In the spring, Diane Lindsley changed the way she stocks her 60 feet of lightbulb shelves. Like other merchants, she has struggled for years with whether to group energy-saving bulbs in their own section for conservation geeks, or to mix them in with regular bulbs in the hope more customers will try them. Either way, particularly for a shopper schooled by Wal-Mart itself to focus on price, CFLs that cost 10 times what a dependable 60-watt cost are a hard sell.

Inspired by last fall's rush of swirl sales, Lindsley moved dramatically to emphasize them on her shelves. She decided to have it both ways--to group CFLs together and mix them with regular bulbs. She has made swirls the most prominent bulbs in the store: They are now on the top two or three shelves, at eye level, with the old-fashioned bulbs on the bottom. The prominence is eye-catching--three or four sections of shelves, with bright yellow and green packages of GE CFLs. Horizontally, the swirls form a band of energy savers that stretch down a third of the aisle. Vertically, each shelf unit is both energy savers and incandescents -- 60-watt-equivalent swirls on top, old-fashioned 60-watts below.

For bulbs, "that's the most coveted shelf space in the entire store," says Bolsinger. "It was a bold move on Wal-Mart's part to put it there." Lindsley was taking a risk, giving swirls shelf space their sales didn't quite justify. She was positioning them prominently to drive sales, and in anticipation of more growth.

An even more dramatic push is coming this month, when Wal-Mart will roll out a lightbulb education center in every U.S. store. The display, developed with GE, shows 10 categories of lightbulbs, organized by room through a typical home, with a box showing the CFL appropriate in that area, the equivalent incandescent, and the energy savings a customer can reap from switching. Each category features a warm lifestyle photo of the room in question. Each box is color-coded to match color-coding on the shelves of CFL bulbs.

For a company that measures sales of its merchandise per running foot of shelf space, giving up 12 feet of stock space to a static display, however entrancing, represents a significant investment. Lindsley is evaluated in part based on the bulbs she sells, and "I have to perform, of course," she says. "I have to have my sales. I think about it differently. I think about it daily. But this is absolutely the right thing to do."

This is at least as big a deal for GE. Between 2004 and 2005, it tripled its manufacturing capacity for compact fluorescents. By the end of 2006, GE will have tripled capacity again. Anticipating the shift to swirls, it plans to close an incandescent bulb factory in St. Louis.

Making compact fluorescents is expensive and complicated, compared with incandescents, in part because of the electronic controls each bulb contains, and in part because swirls remain partly handcrafted. To make each spiral, a Chinese worker wearing gloves takes a tube of glass, holds it over an open flame, then wraps the heat-softened tube around a metal form. The job requires a deft touch so the tube doesn't become flattened while getting its spiral shape.

"For us," says Bolsinger, "the opportunity is to sell enough of them, to get down the [manufacturing] cost curve. We're still pretty early in the learning curve." Greater automation would allow GE to both continue to reduce the price of swirls and keep a margin that softens the blow to the incandescent side of the business.

This fall, GE will rebrand its CFLs as "energy smart" bulbs--in an effort to give them a clear identity equivalent to "soft white"--and launch a major print advertising campaign to support the Wal-Mart push. Working with Wal-Mart, GE has made its bulb packaging both more dramatic and more explicit--it promises that the 60-watt equivalent "saves $38 in energy." Spend $2.60, earn $38. These days, that's a great return.

At the Wal-Mart home office, they talk about swirls with a zeal that goes beyond product promotion, as if the bulbs are a pioneering product, a new way of thinking about retailing. Says Andrew Ruben, Wal-Mart's vice president of sustainability: "We realize that we can influence big things. Energy usage. Efficiency. Dependence on foreign oil. And we realized that if we're really going to move things, it's not about our direct footprint--our stores, our offices--it's about our supply chain and our customers. So this is about selling lightbulbs, but it's far bigger. This has huge implications for the world."

Chuck Kerby did swap out the ceiling-fan bulbs, at least in most Wal-Marts. The idea surfaced in November; it was executed in February. And Kerby has a clear vision of the future.

"It's certainly possible to see a day when a cartoonist will draw a cartoon with a character having an idea," says Kerby, "you know, with the traditional-shaped incandescent lightbulb going on over the character's head--and my grandchildren will look at that and not know what it means. And that's not a bad thing, because we'll be living in a much better world."

Charles Fishman (cnfish at mindspring.com) is a Fast Company senior writer.

Labels: , , ,

Reduce Home Electric

There are so many ways to change little things to make life easier, cheaper AND better for the environment.

Please tell me of any that I don't have listed!

At some point, when the compilation is a bit larger, I'll reorganize so it makes more sense. For now, you'll have to sift through.

All pictures thanks to Home Trends - www.shophometrends.com
Compact Fluorescents
Wikipedia CFL Info
Great Article Comparing 1 CFL To Changing The World
I have found at least 8 different styles - flood, globe, traditional looking, 3-way, "true light", super bright, yellow (bugs aren't attracted), miniature, etc. Once I can get the html set up, I'll post pictures.

True Light - Great for Crafting

MiniCFL = to 40w





Indoor Flood - They didn't last a week for me.


Globe CFL - I am in LOVE with these!




Bug CFL Bulb - Aren't attracted to yellow light





Ultra Bright CFL



3-Way CFL - didn't last too long, but no less than a regular in our house.



CFL with Traditional Look









Clothes Lines
Indoor or outdoor, these save tons on electric or natural gas - depending on which your dryer uses.
Outdoor



To Drip Dry in Your Bathroom






Indoor Drying Rack

Hanger Dryer










Dryer Balls
These work! I bought them for my family to try - just to see - and they work! You can get them in catalogs or in most drug stores. It has saved at least 10% on our dryer's electric use.











Dryer Vents
Something as simple as how you vent your dryer can save.

Colder locations should use one that needs the force of the air moving OUT to open the valve. Will keep cold air from coming back through into your dryer and home.




Venting an electric dryer inside the home during winter months will heat and humidify the air - reducing heat needs and respiratory infections. It's already paid for, so you might as well get double duty out of it

Labels: , ,